Monday, February 24, 2014

Vitamins and Supplements



             First and foremost. Vitamins and other dietary supplements are not intended to be a food substitute. They cannot replace all of the nutrients and benefits of whole foods. The need to state this clearly is so that any information shared will not be misconstrued or misunderstood to imply that the use of over the counter vitamins and other supplements, can replace a balanced and nutritious eating regimen. Or better said, "They can plug nutrition gaps in your diet, but it is short-sighted to think your vitamin or mineral is the ticket to good health -- the big power is on the plate, not in a pill," explains Roberta Anding, MS, RD, a spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association. It is always better to get your nutrients from food. This statement amongst others, are some of the reasons we began to dig deeper into the use behind over-the-counter vitamins that flood our market. Curiousity began to present more questions, why are there particular types of vitamins for men, women and children? What is the purpose or logic for this?  With a business background, is this simply an effective marketing campaign? So cynical, I know.

     Ironically, we grew up on "vitamins". If memory serves correct, they were of the Flinstone variety. They thought of them now brings chills and a cringe. It was for all the right reasons based on all the wrong misinformation. Venture to propose, if the meals we are eating provide us with the nutrients necessary remain nourished and healthy, why would there be a need for more. After digging and enjoying the likes of dozens of ear tickling articles discussing and sharing facts surrounding this, there was a common underlying theme. While well-intent, there is no indication that there are measurable effects in overall health, cardiovascular health, life expectancy or weight control. Also, there are no age-defying benefits proven from supplement use.   Annals of Internal Medicine at Annals.org suggests that multivitamins provide no health benefit in the long-run, and in fact, “should be avoided.” The authors of the piece, “Enough is Enough: Stop Wasting Money on Vitamin and Mineral Supplements,” summarize the work of three review studies in the same journal, which together find no effect for vitamins on cardiovascular health, cancer risk, cognitive health, or mortality. The bottom line, at least to the authors, is clear: We should stop wasting our money on multivitamins, since there’s little evidence to their benefit, and some evidence to their detriment. Read enough nutrition news, and you’ll see that not all scientists agree on multivitamins. Some say that there’s not enough proof that multivitamins boost health, so they don’t recommend them. 

      The strong message was based on a review of the findings from three studies that tracked multivitamins link to cancer protection, heart health, and brain and cognitive measures. “We believe that the case is closed -- supplementing the diet of well-nourished adults with (most) mineral or vitamin supplements has no clear benefit and might even be harmful,” concluded the authors of the  summarizing the new research papers, published December 16 of 2013 in the Annals of Internal Medicine. “These vitamins should not be used for chronic disease prevention. Enough is enough", they conclude. Although some studies have linked vitamin use to increased risk of death, these studies have been excluded as flawed with flagrant misrepresentation throughout. This is reflective of the diplomatic approach with which the medical community is addressing these misconceptions. They don't kill, but the don't improve overall life expectancy through improved health. 

      The amount of each mineral extract in each capsule usually includes some high percentage of a concentrated amount. These intense dosages may effect our nervous system adversely at times with side effects such as frequent urination or an odorous or colorful urine. For instance, too much Vitamin C could lead to problems including hair loss, gastrointestinal upset, fatigue, and mild nerve damage. These are some of the more obvious and tell-tale signs of the immediate reaction our bodies have to these supplements. Iron and calcium are most likely to cause toxicity symptoms, but other vitamins and minerals could cause adverse effects as well in large amounts. Toxicity symptoms include irregular or rapid heartbeat, cloudy urine or more frequent urination, diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, stomach pain, hair loss, dry skin, rash, muscle pain, bone pain, joint pain, confusion, fatigue, convulsions, fainting and irritability. The exact symptoms you experience will depend on which nutrients you are consuming in excessive amounts. Too much of anything is not good for the system. 

      As stated, naturally occurring vitamins through fresh fruit or vegetables and an otherwise nutritious eating regimen serve as a more effective source of vitamins and minerals.  The validity of many of the health benefits and improved function and overall wellness, can be questioned due to the actual statistics gathered reflecting many of the benefits and con factors. We encourage you and others to investigate your own habits and practices, until the purpose and logic of the behavior coincides with the benefits.



CC


      




Thursday, February 13, 2014

Arctic Apples asFrankenfruit


        An apple a day keeps the Dr away,  right? Well...maybe not.  This phrase may become obsolete if the powers that be allow Frankenfruit into our markets and onto our tables. With the developments of the newest GMO commodity, the Arctic Apple, this could be no further from the truth. If unaware, Arctic apples include varieties of apples that contain a non browning trait introduced through biotechnology developed through a process of genetic engineering and precision breeding by Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc. (OSF) whom are based out of British Columbia, Canada. The advantage being marketed is that money can be saved due to the lack of natural "browning" seen in apples once the apple is cut for consumption. More specifically, this gene silencing is used to turn down the expression of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), thus preventing the fruit from browning. Very sci-fi eh? 

        President of OSF, Neil Carter created the new, non-browning, "Arctic" apples, and remains optimistic. Food service companies, he says, would no longer have to treat their sliced apples with chemicals such as calcium ascorbate to preserve the look of freshness. The non-browning trait was developed by inserting extra copies of genes that the apple already possesses. When extra copies of the gene are added, the apple reacts by shutting down all of them, stopping production of the enzyme and preventing the browning reaction. (It's the immediate "enzymatic browning" that's blocked.) OSF licensed this technique from the Australian research institute where it was initially discovered. So they will in a sense serve as the marketing driver behind the GMO fruit and not in the actual development of the technique. This is an obvious business decision solely contributing to profit for he organization as opposed to the health of the public and sustainability of agriculture! 

      Via The USDA’s assessment dated August 2013, it  states several times that the cross pollination between GMO apples and non-GMO apples will result in GMO hybrid seed. According to the published article An Overview of Arctic Apples, published by Kenong Xu from the Department of Horticulture at Cornell University in Geneva, NY: a study specifically designed to investigate and predict transgenic seed contamination resulting from cross-pollination in apple, a physical distance of 600 ft  separating transgenic and non-transgenic would be sufficient to prevent from cross- pollination. This is primarily attributed to the fact that apple is an exclusively insect- pollinated crop. Although the study did not use Arctic Apples Another important fact to know is that when cross-pollination does occur, the seeds will be the only part in fruit that will carry the trans- gene as the rest of the fruit, including the flesh, are all developed from the pollen recipient tree and therefore are non-transgenic. As bees cannot be contained within a certain property, cross pollination cannot be prevented. Non-GMO apples will be contaminated. Putting this GMO pollen source into our already delicate industry may put in question all the apple breeding programs around the world. Through natural, cross pollination hundreds of thousands of seeds are planted each year, and the fruit from those seedlings are then evaluated. Many of these all-natural selections show up having characteristics such as pink flesh, white flesh and non-browning flesh. Of course, like any non-organic apple, the new GMO Arctic Apple will be drenched in toxic pesticide residues, untested by the U.S. Food & Drug Association (FDA) and likely unlabeled. And of course these shiny new high-tech apples will be cheap, priced considerably lower than a pesticide-free, nutrient-dense, old-fashioned organic apple that turns a little brown after you slice it up. 

     These new apples are waiting approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. At the moment, there are currently non-browning versions of Golden Delicious and Granny Smith apples. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has allowed OSF to produce them in test plots covering a few acres in the states of New York and Washington. The is company now is working to put the trait in Fuji and Gala apples, too. Since the USDA has studied the apple and released a preliminary conclusion that Arctic apples are pretty much as harmless as conventional ones, I guess we should now all breathe a sigh of relief? We can view the assessment and it was also open for public comment until the end of January 2014, and thousands of people took advantage of the opportunity to speak out. 

     Even if the USDA approved the apples within a few months, as OSF wants, it would take several years before commercial quantities of non-browning apples could show up in grocery stores. This is bad news no matter how you slice it. We have to use our voice to make clear we do not want engineered apples in our markets, especially if distribution begins under the guise of not being mandated to label GMO products such as these! We like our apples as nature intends them to exist. If you want to lend your voice here is a link.



https://www.change.org/petitions/say-no-to-gmo-apples



CC